Modular 4.6L Tech For all your 1996-2005+ 2V, 3V, and 4V modular motor needs.

Accufab Vs. C&L Plenum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-13-2005, 03:47 PM
SLVR04GT's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 78
Default Accufab Vs. C&L Plenum

Ding Ding Ding, Let the fight begin. I know they only sell Accufab here, But C&L Shows some mad gains on a car similar to mine. Can the Accufab TB REALLY be $100+ Better?
 
  #2  
Old 02-13-2005, 04:22 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Originally Posted by SLVR04GT
Ding Ding Ding, Let the fight begin. I know they only sell Accufab here, But C&L Shows some mad gains on a car similar to mine. Can the Accufab TB REALLY be $100+ Better?
Accufab is dyno proven to have better horsepower gains. Check out this tb/plenum showdown...
http://www.modulardepot.com/?show=articlesdet&aid=38
 
  #3  
Old 02-13-2005, 05:06 PM
tedinde's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bear Delaware
Posts: 220
Default

Has anyone on here that has changed their throttle body and plenum feel it was worth the $300-$400 that they spent?? Im debating.

I ported and polished my old 5.0 mustang intake and got some gains, but a lot of work. I might just bust the die grinder out on my stock one and match everything up and open it up a bit.
 
  #4  
Old 02-13-2005, 05:16 PM
WaterDR's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,613
Default

I always feel a mod is worth it when I am done! (lol)

Let the truth be told, that this combo will net you 10 rwhp in the bank. That comes at a cost of $30 - $40 per hp which is about the price of many mods. More than some (nitrous, some X pipes, and pullies), but less than others (heads, cams installed, etc...). It is no steal, but money well spent. You also will have a much better throttle response.
 
  #5  
Old 02-13-2005, 05:40 PM
Stevoneo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 598
Default

Getting the accufab with a 75mm TB is setting yourself up better in the long haul when you want to add a power adder. Remember that when putting mods on your car, "What will this do down the road when I get this or that". Play the what if game and see if it is worth it. Getting Accufab might have more horses drawn than C&L when you add a super charger. Not a fact since I have not seen dynos with these when a super charger is added.

Also accufabs chrome makes a nice bling bling to your car. :brushteet
 
  #6  
Old 02-13-2005, 06:29 PM
SLVR04GT's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 78
Default

Wow that really helps! lol But it comes down to like 100 bucks between the C&L and the accufab...Sure wish the C&L was just as pretty! lol and that with a accufab 75mm TB

On a side note... i wanted to thank eveyone for the polite answers and not talkin down to me like Ive seen on other sites. So yeah THANKS
 
  #7  
Old 02-13-2005, 06:39 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Ive got the 70mm tb/plenum and i really like it. It REALLY pulls after 3000 rpm. A great buy IMO.
 
  #8  
Old 02-14-2005, 01:47 AM
02wt5sp's Avatar
rice..it'swhat'sfordinner
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: hampton va
Posts: 324
Default

I went with the trickflow, (only cuz a buddy sold it to me for 50 bucks) but I wouldn't pay an extra 100 bucks for 3-4 hp. With that extra 100 you can buy something else that will give you more than 3 hp.
 
  #9  
Old 02-14-2005, 04:36 AM
sbrooks's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: El Paso, TX/FOB Marez, Iraq
Posts: 173
Default

I went with the Accufab it really pulls after 3000 rpm and it also has the looks. But it has been proven to produce more. SO spend the extra money for a quality product
 
  #10  
Old 02-14-2005, 05:42 AM
Chopper's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Parkersburg Wv.
Posts: 257
Default

I went with the Accufab 75 mm T/B and plenum.After installation I test drove the car and after a warm-up I took off in 1st, banged second and the car went sideways :toothy12: It never did that before.Plus,the polish on the Accufab parts is very good.The downside is now I have to get other parts chromed or polished to match,or paint the Accufab parts.
 
  #11  
Old 02-14-2005, 02:23 PM
Stevoneo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 598
Default

I am getting the accufab and 75mm TB. First for the performance and for the Venom Nitrous kit that I am getting. Yes it will be chrome, However, I am putting a Shaker Ram Air Intake on my Stang as well. So the Chrome plenum and TB will not be seen as much.

But one will buy what he or she wants, and all to his own as the saying goes.

Like I have said before, look ahead at what you will do with your car and what will benifit most for you and that will be what you want and need to buy. Also if you dont have the dough, that factors in as well. :icon_thum
 
  #12  
Old 02-14-2005, 06:31 PM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 868
Default

There is really almost no difference between any of the brands. I have the C & L with an Accufab 75mm. I really didn't feel any seat of the pants gains but I did trap 1-1.5 higher than I did with my stock unit ported and polished so it did help. I wish the polished Accufab was out when I got mine, it looks alot nicer than my C & L. Good luck and enjoy whatever you end up with.
 
  #13  
Old 02-15-2005, 11:40 AM
RedLineCrazy's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 18
Default

The accufab is polished giving it like 2 hp more over the c&l. I have a c&l which i polished myself.
 
  #14  
Old 02-15-2005, 01:26 PM
buddyabe's Avatar
SILVER 01 GT CONVERT AUTO
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coon rapids mn. u.s.a.
Posts: 205
  #15  
Old 02-15-2005, 03:42 PM
buddyabe's Avatar
SILVER 01 GT CONVERT AUTO
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: coon rapids mn. u.s.a.
Posts: 205
Default

the above website has a great comparison article on plenums. the accufab plenums wins the dyno comparison. accufabs throtle body also offers better quality and driveabilty than the bbk. I returned my cl plenum and bbk tb after reading this article.
 
  #16  
Old 02-15-2005, 04:04 PM
MattJ's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,237
Default

Originally Posted by buddyabe
the above website has a great comparison article on plenums. the accufab plenums wins the dyno comparison. accufabs throtle body also offers better quality and driveabilty than the bbk. I returned my cl plenum and bbk tb after reading this article.
I posted that already...
:dontknow:
 
  #17  
Old 02-15-2005, 05:02 PM
Blue02GT's Avatar
Ex Mini Smack King
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 868
Default

There have been several shoot outs in mags. There really is almost no difference in performance between the units. Expect about 6-8 rwhp on a near stock car and 8-10 in a modded car. The accufab is polished on the outside for apperance not performance. It looks real nice. If I could do it all over again I'd go with it just for the better apperance.
 
  #18  
Old 02-16-2005, 02:17 AM
RedLineCrazy's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 18
Default

accufab is polished on the inside to. its smooth like a babys a$$. My C&L was all gritty till i smoothened it out. Now its just like an accufab.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rabbit
The Lounge
11
09-01-2006 11:58 AM
jjtgiants
The Lounge
8
06-02-2005 11:29 AM
csledd
AmericanMuscle
2
05-31-2005 01:33 PM
madmatt
Modular 4.6L Tech
3
10-17-2004 08:21 AM
mike sweeney
Modular 4.6L Tech
22
09-28-2004 10:59 AM



Quick Reply: Accufab Vs. C&L Plenum



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 AM.